Carton Recycling - Big 4 Commit |
| Tuesday, 14 April 2009 | |
|
Corpobligation: Shared environmental commitments between packaging competitors can lead to change. Packaging creates waste but is essential for getting products to consumers. Can packaging producers be expected to minimize packaging?
The Carton Council's communication strategy (by GolinHarris) emphasizes 3 R's and the benefits of paper-based cartons versus plastic packaging. Note that "reuse" is missing and has been replaced with "renew." Reduce:
Renew:
Recycle:
So does this amount to environmentally responsible packaging?The Carton Council is not proposing a standard that could be enforced legally. However, the promises could be used to name and shame, if carton council members did not live up to their commitments. The bottom line challenge is that the Council members' business is selling packaging. To minimize the environmental footprint, packing must be minimized. How can packaging producers be green and profitable when their business is inherently garbage producing? Steps for the future: Products could be shipped in bulk to retailers and then consumers could refill their containers. Carton Council members could use recycled or Forest Stewardship Council certified materials. Is this a step toward corpobligation?Carton Council members are embracing a responsibility to communities and demonstrating a respect for the interests of stakeholders. The fact that the contact for the press release comes from a public relations company could raise questions about sincerity. However, time will tell how serious packing producers are. Other stakeholders (NGOs, retailers, governments) could enter into agreements with Carton Council members that would create stronger incentives to meet commitments and provide external validation of successes. Plastic is worse see bags and bottles.
|
| Next > |
|---|




