|
Green News
|
|
Wednesday, 06 June 2007 |
|
CO: Undoubtedly, corporations taking steps
to reduce their ecological footprints are a step in the right direction, but
how can we judge corporate sincerity?
- “Coca-Cola, the world's largest beverage
maker, intends to make up for the 290 billion liters (76 billion gallons) of
water…the company and its bottlers use each year to make Coke, Sprite, Fanta
and other drinks.”
- Can Coca-Cola be present in China without condoning human rights and environmental abuses?
- Coca Cola has a delicious flavour but it
may leave a bitter taste in its workers throats, as seen in its union relations
in Columbia - Coke's Columbia site
- Coke has stated: "Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
The Company respects our employees' right to join, form or not to
join a labor union without fear of reprisal, intimidation or harassment.
Where employees are represented by a legally recognized union, we
are committed to establishing a constructive dialogue with their freely
chosen representatives. The Company is committed to bargaining in
good faith with such representatives."
- Coca Cola recently won the Polaris Institute's Corporate Greenwashing Award
- ** Full disclosure, this author drinks more Coke than his teeth would prefer.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Green News
|
|
Wednesday, 30 May 2007 |
|
Conferences are a great opportunity to network and learn. Should corpobligation be there?
- Here the focus is on alternative energy sources and plans. Note the orientation of the speakers tends towards the big existing players although Bullfrog will also be present. See a related an analysis of this up and coming alternative energy company.
EECO 2007: Learn About Proactive Business Solutions that Address Environmental Issues in Ontario
(CSRwire) TORONTO, ON- May 29, 2007 - Climate change is becoming a global reality.
From rapidly increasing temperatures and elevating water levels to extreme
weather patterns, damaged ecosystems and declining agricultural output, it
is time for individuals, businesses and governments to learn about these
issues and plan for the future. Particularly, Ontario and the Great Lakes
region, the industrial epicenter of North America, must discover how to
balance economic growth and energy resources with clean air. While many
governments and businesses have adopted environmental policies, one must
ask: is this enough? Are sufficient preparations underway? How will these
changes affect business and society? These important issues and more will
be discussed by over 700 delegates at Ontario’s largest conference on
Energy & Climate Change, EECO 2007, June 19 & 20 at the Metro Toronto
Convention Centre.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Green News
|
|
Friday, 18 May 2007 |
|
CO: What happens when an industry-specific publication decides to define green building? Who is consulted? How does the publication's definition get legitimacy?
- Green Builder(R) Media, the
leading national purveyor of information and education about residential
green building and sustainable development, announces its new corporate
mission: "Defining Green(TM)." - Is a trademark of a phrase like "Defining Green" fair given the interests of government, industry and consumers, all of whom will likely have something to contribute to the debate.
-
"We have found that our readers and advertisers want us to take a
bolder, more authoritative leadership position within the green space and
to actually define what green means," says Sara Gutterman, CEO of Green
Builder Media.
- This is not to criticize the concept of green building.
Other sources of standards:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Financial News
|
|
Friday, 18 May 2007 |
|
CO: Corporations and their directors are accountable to shareholders. Directors' have a fiduciary duty to the corporation, which is mostly noticed when things go wrong: Enron, Hollinger and Conrad Black, Nortel's $2.5 billion settlement and the passage of Ontario's Bill 198.
* * *
Shareholder Association for Reserch and Education presents a Pension Investment & Governance Seminar Series
Securities Class Actions & Trustees Fiduciary
Responsibilities – June 14
in Toronto
In the wake of Nortel's $2.5 billion settlement and the passage of
Ontario's Bill 198, fiduciary duties for trustees are changing. With
investors successfully suing companies to recover losses caused by
corporate wrongdoing, are trustees and other fiduciaries who fail to
act in breach of their responsibilities?
This seminar will
help pension trustees and other fiduciaries evaluate the governance and
legal implications of these trends for their pension and investment
funds. Presenters will look at the role of shareholder litigation in
strengthening corporate governance; the implications of U.S.
settlements for Canadian funds; as well as Canadian and international
experiences with secruities class actions and shareholder litigation.
Join
us to hear from Canadian and international pension and legal experts
from Grant & Eisenhofer, Koskie Minsky and the Osgoode Hall Law
School. Pension trustees who have been involved in securities
litigation in Canada, the U.S. and the UK will also share their
experiences.
The seminar will take place from 8:00am to 4:45pm
in the East Wing Room at the Osgoode Hall Professional Development
Centre located at 1 Dundas Street, 26th floor.
Click here to view the complete seminar program.
TO REGISTER: Continue reading
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Green News
|
|
Tuesday, 15 May 2007 |
|
CO: Small scale dams on rivers may disrupt the environment in unanticipatedly severe ways. When does green energy become bad for the environment?
- what does the term small scale mean, when talking about projects ranging from producing 0.5 to 210 gigawatt hours each per year?
- Peak power production (spring melt) will not be in alignment with peak demand (winter). The author suggests that this is just an attempt to generate electricity for sale to the U.S.
- What are the potential long-term or knock-on effects of multiple watercourse diversions (dams)?
- Keep reading to find a list of sources on the issue
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Financial News
|
|
Sunday, 06 May 2007 |
|
CO: Why is it so hard to come up with the right balance of corporate carrots and sticks? Even companies like Yahoo that have a hip modern image (vulnerable to public pressure) are placed in an awkward position when faced with liability claims.
- The Alien Torts Claim Act mentioned in the following article, permits civil claims by "aliens", non-US citizens, for breaches of international law. It has been read to provide a remedy to victims of human rights abuses.
- See the transcript of Microsoft, Yahoo and Google's testimony before US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs
- Under pressure from the Chinese government, Yahoo disclosed some information about its users and their search patterns. Allegedly, this led to a human rights violation.
- What could Yahoo do?
- China might have shut them down and they might have lost money. They might have been replaced by another search company (ie google).
- They could have tried to negotiate an agreement that censored terms but did not disclose user searches.
- They could have gone ahead as they did under protest.
- Arguably, they were screwed either way. But now they are faced with both a claim under the ACTA and a shareholder motion for the Board of Directors to form a human rights committee.
TAKEAWAY: Corporations are placed in an awkward position when they face competing incentives: wanting to appear green and clean, but wishing to avoid liability.
Q: Will you or anyone you know stop using yahoo or google? See Google's testimony before the US congress about this issue.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Human Rights News
|
|
Tuesday, 01 May 2007 |
|
CO: Jump on the old "Walmart slammin' bandwagon". Now criticisms have even more legitimacy, see this Human Rights Watch Report:
Wal-Mart Denies Workers Basic Rights
Weak Labor Laws Perpetuate Abuses
(Washington, DC, May 1, 2007) – Wal-Mart’s relentless exploitation
of weak US labor laws thwarts union formation and violates the rights
of its US workers, Human Rights Watch said in a new report released
today.
In the 210-page report, “Discounting Rights: Wal-Mart’s Violation of US Workers’ Right to Freedom of Association,”
Human Rights Watch found that while many American companies use weak US
laws to stop workers from organizing, the retail giant stands out for
the sheer magnitude and aggressiveness of its anti-union apparatus.
Many of its anti-union tactics are lawful in the United States, though
they combine to undermine workers’ rights. Others run afoul of soft US
laws.
“Wal-Mart workers have virtually no chance to organize
because they’re up against unfair US labor laws and a giant company
that will do just about anything to keep unions out,” said Carol Pier,
senior researcher on labor rights and trade for Human Rights Watch.
“That one-two punch devastates workers’ right to form and join unions.”
This story has already been picked up by the International Heral Tribune: "Human Rights Watch says Wal-Mart has broken labor laws" by Steven Greenhouse
NEW YORK: In its first study of how an American
company treats its workers, Human Rights Watch asserted that Wal-Mart's
aggressive efforts to keep out labor unions often violated federal law
and infringed on its workers' rights.
...
"While many American companies use weak U.S. laws to stop workers
from organizing, the retail giant stands out for the sheer magnitude
and aggressiveness of its anti-union apparatus," the human rights group
wrote.
Wal-Mart Stores has more than 1.3 million workers at its nearly
4,000 stores in the United States, none of whom belong to a union.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>
|
| Results 56 - 64 of 64 |