|
Friday, 17 August 2007 |
Corpobligation: Governments contribute funding to universities,
should they vet appointments by partisan terms? Have funding
realities destroyed academic independence?
-
Not wanting to be pedantic, of course academic independence
has been undermined by financial realities: universities sign
exclusive agreements with Coke, drug companies name buildings,
professors have to seek their own research funding from companies
and the government.
-
UBC was seeking to hire a Vice-President of External and
Community Relations: “Former Tory MP John Reynolds was asked
whether the appointment of Liberal MP Stephen Owen as vice president
would be a “problem” for the university.”
-
Link Article in the Globe and Mail
-
Where does corporate obligation come in? Universities have obligations to at the least ensure academic independence. It is a little frightening to see universities spending funds on lobbying.
-
Isn't UBC just acting like any rational actor? Perhaps, the
mistake was to get caught? See related
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Wednesday, 15 August 2007 |
Corpobligation: Universities losing face?
-
How should universities screen donations?
-
“Naming a noteworthy building or a street
after an individual is one of the most visible ways society can
recognize outstanding achievements that contribute to the public
good. Institutions
like hospitals and universities make similar gestures when they name
wings or programs after individuals whose career dedication or
financial contributions leave a legacy that benefits future
generations.”
-
“...have
we really come to the point where even a university’s good
name is up for sale at the right price like some “rebranded”
hockey arena?”
-
See Marc Spooner's article,
“Universities losing face: Sign of the times?”
-
Where does corporate obligation come in? Universities are
often faced with the opportunity to receive “donations”
from corporations, which seek to bolster their brand and invest in
basic research and training for their future employees.
-
Question: When should universities take or refuse a donation?
Is any money too dirty? See related
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Wednesday, 15 August 2007 |
|
By Marc Spooner, Ph. D. Chair, University
Watch
Naming
a noteworthy building or a street after an individual is one of the most
visible ways society can recognize outstanding achievements that contribute to
the public good.
Institutions
like hospitals and universities make similar gestures when they name wings or
programs after individuals whose career dedication or financial contributions leave
a legacy that benefits future generations. This type of recognition is a
laudable practice that serves both to honour these fine role-models as well as
to remind us all to strive for noble ideals.
It can imbue public places with meaning and enrich our shared sense of
history.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Thursday, 26 July 2007 |
|
CO: Students from colleges and universities across the USA and Canada converged on the US Congress to wake up legislators and to learn more about how to "Change It"
- Work shops were led by experienced facilitators to turn student passion into action
- Will this make a difference in the future? Yes. Organization is essential to ensure that energy and outrage is channeled effectively into change.
- Participant Jenna K ., New Jersey, pledges to change the world: "By teaching others that our choices will make a difference in environmental and social justice standards for future generations."
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Tuesday, 10 July 2007 |
|
Student coalitions can promote human rights and draw attention to issues as seen in the efforts of STAND USA (A Student Coalition Against Gencide in Darfur formerly Students Taking Action Now for Darfur ) and STAND Canada (still Students Taking Action Now for Darfur).
These groups have formed coalitions and brought wide ranges of students together to pressure their respective governments and to push for divestment of university, pension and other funds. The coalition has reached beyond just university students to include highschool students, which bodes well for the future of the movement.
STAND Canada produces a series of excellent newsletters on the issue, which are accessible from their website.
STAND USA also has a newsletter accessible from their site and a news section.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|